In the summer of 2020, you may have seen a petition circulating social media urging the Crown to appeal two related cases that were heard at the Ontario Court of Appeal: R. v. Sullivan and R. v. Chan. The issue pinpointed by this petition and the attention surrounding these cases seemed to be that they would make it easier for perpetrators of sexual assault to be acquitted thus further marginalizing survivors of sexual assault. It is understandable that the offence of sexual assault brings out strong emotions in people. Sexual assault is a harrowing and life-altering experience. That being said, the subsequent attention and critique these cases attracted misunderstands the state of the law.

While the circumstances of Sullivan and Chan were tragic, neither of them dealt with sexual assault. In Sullivan, Mr. Sullivan ingested multiple doses of a drug in a suicide attempt. This drug caused psychosis, and he stabbed his mother repeatedly—believing her to be an alien. In Chan, Mr. Chan ingested “magic mushrooms.” He began experiencing hallucinations, including believing that he was God. He broke into his father’s house, stabbing his father several times as well as injuring his father’s partner. Both Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Chan experienced extreme intoxication.

The main issue in these appeals hinged on the constitutionality of section 33.1 of the Criminal Code. Section 33.1 essentially states that an accused cannot use the defence that they were so intoxicated that they lacked the general intent or voluntariness to commit the offence, if that intoxication was self-induced. Criminal offences either involve general intent or specific intent. General intent offences, like assault or even sexual assault, require very minimal mental acuity; usually the fact that you committed the offence is enough to prove the mental element. The thinking behind section 33.1 is that if these offences have such a low threshold when it comes to their mental element, then whether an accused is intoxicated is irrelevant. What the Court of Appeal said in Sullivan and Chan is that when it comes to extreme intoxication, that level of intoxication not irrelevant. In fact, the Court struck down section 33.1, ruling that an accused could now used this defence. The backlash began.

The backlash to the defence, however, is not new. In 1994, the Supreme Court released its judgment in R. v. Daviault. In Daviault, the accused had consumed seven to eight bottles of beer and almost an entire 40-ounce bottle of brandy. He was accused of sexually assaulting the complainant, although he had no recollection of that. A pharmacologist testified that someone at that level of intoxication could experience a blackout and lose touch with reality. The Supreme Court found that extreme intoxication, even when self-induced, can be a used as a defence. It dubbed such extreme intoxication as being “akin to automatism.” The Court noted that while it is an available defence, it is not a defence that can normally be successfully mounted.

There was a similar critique in response to Daviault as there is now to Sullivan and Chan. At that time, Parliament enacted section 33.1 to preclude accused persons from relying on Daviault and the extreme intoxication defence. Sixteen years later, Sullivan and Chan basically reiterated the arguments in Daviault. Not only do the arguments still seem pertinent, the link of this defence to sexual assault through Daviault seems to still be fresh in people’s minds.

Yet it is important to understand the reasoning behind these decisions. We have to understand the fundamental principles of criminal law and justice. One of the most fundamental principles underlying Daviault, Chan, and Sullivan—and criminal law in general—is the principle of voluntariness. It is said that criminal law sanctions actions that an individual does voluntarily. The concept of voluntariness is behind every offence, and it must be demonstrated. But what if the accused does not have awareness and control over their actions? What if they have no concept of what has occurred? Section 33.1 allows an accused to be convicted for involuntary acts (acts that cannot be said to truly be their own), which violates their Charter right to life, liberty, and security of the person and their guarantee of the presumption of innocence. Furthermore, it is the Crown’s duty to prove all requisite elements of an offence beyond a reasonable doubt; section 33.1 allows them to circumvent this requirement.

No matter how ostensibly heinous an offence is or how unsympathetic or unsavoury an accused person is, we cannot pick and choose how fundamental principles are applied and who is afforded these protections. If we did that, our rights would become meaningless. The Crown would then become our judge and jury. It is doubtful that anyone would want to live in such a state of affairs.

Sullivan and Chan and the critiques that follow them present a good time to reflect on the principles of criminal law and how the justice system functions. We must understand and appreciate these principles. We must understand that extreme intoxication is not a catch-all defence. It is not an easy thing to prove in the slightest, and it cannot be emphasized enough that this defence is reserved for the rarest of cases. But our justice system is better for having rulings like Sullivan and Chan.

By |2023-08-11T10:34:18+00:00December 21st, 2020|Sexual Assault|

5/5 - (1 vote)

Criminal Lawyers Association
Toronnto Lawyers Association
Law Society of Ontario
Criminal Lawyers Association
Toronnto Lawyers Association
Law Society of Ontario
Excellent4.9 Based on 99 reviews fromDaniel SlobodkinDaniel Slobodkin ★★★★★ I have known Mr. Vilkhov in a professional and personal capacity for several years. Mr. Vilkhov is a well-respected and devoted criminal lawyer who prioritizes the success and livelihood of his clients. Mr. Vilkhov goes out of his way and makes time, at all times of day, to tend to the needs of his clients. Mr. Vilkhov is a diligent lawyer I would recommend to anyone dealing with a criminal matter. Well-spoken, confident, methodical and professional are qualities that only begin to scratch the surface of Mr. Vilkhov criminal law practice and his character at whole.Amina HuseynovaAmina Huseynova ★★★★★ I've known Igor professionally for a long time, one of the most dedicated criminal lawyers I have met. He gets amazing results for his clients and I would recommend anyone who is looking to hire him.maddy mmaddy m ★★★★★ I am international student in Canada, six months ago I was falsely accused of SA and I was charged. I had never dealt with all this in my life and I started looking for a lawyer. I spoke too more than 50 lawyers all over ontario and every lawyer I spoke to tried to scare me and told me that I am a dead meat here and this thing is definitely going to trial and were only interested in talking about their fees. Mr Vilkhov patiently heard my case and told me that there is a high possibility of getting the case withdrawn . He was straightforward and honest. He convinced me after one call that he is the right lawyer for me to retain. He charged a very reasonable fee which he let me pay in installments. He kept me well informed about my case in every stage. Mr. Vilkhov and Daniel from his team were my constant support. Every message and every phone call was answered.Mr Vilkhov got the charges withdrawn!!! My case was in a jurisdictions were cases like these never get withdrawn. But Mr. Vilkhov gave his best and got the charges withdrawn without any conditions. I cannot thank Vilkhov law professional for giving my life back! Mr. Vilkhov is very knowledgeable and he is the lawyer you need by your side when you need it the most! He wins when you need it the most! Thank you Vilkhov law corporation!Jay ModiJay Modi ★★★★★ Igor and his team exceeded my expectations, efficiently getting all charges dropped in my case. His timely responses, coupled with Daniel's eloquence, made for an exceptional first-time experience with a lawyer. They provided a unique blend of empathy and straightforwardness that instilled confidence throughout the legal process. Highly recommendable for anyone in need of a criminal justice lawyer.Naqib PopalNaqib Popal ★★★★★ I just left Brampton courthouse. I was acquitted of 11 charges after a long trial. Igor Vilkhov absolutely killed it during the entire trial. If it wasn’t for him, I would be going to jail. Thank you so much for your work, you ensured the truth came out. Thank you, you got me my life back.Chad AllanChad Allan ★★★★★ Igor got me an amazing deal, he was always communicating with me and updating me about my case, he got me the deal of a lifetime and I can’t him enough. If you are reading this and you are thinking about who to hire, just call him, he is the right lawyer for you.Jamie LewisJamie Lewis ★★★★★ If you need a lawyer who is actually going to work for you, and get results go with Igor at Vilkhov Law. He was very patient and understanding and knows his stuff. I was facing a huge fine which would have devastated me financially for years to come, but with his passionate submission to crown on my behalf he was able to get the fine reduced by 90%. His colleagues he works with are amazing too. Thank you so much for all of your help through this matter Igor! You truely have saved my future. I appreciate it beyond measure! All the best in the future!Akash TyagiAkash Tyagi ★★★★★ Hi all, When i just came to Canada, i got charged with SA, which was a nightmare for me where my so called friends left my side. Then by luck i got to know Mr. Igor and that day changed everything.Being new in a country could cost me a lot but with Igor’s genuine efforts to help me, saved my life.A big thanks to him and god bless him.Must recommended lawyer.Thanks a ton Igor.❤️ted ferreirated ferreira ★★★★★ I met Igor approximately two years ago when we met with him regarding SA charges against our son. Over that time Igor was always there to answer questions that we had, he was reassuring explaining that we had a strong case.From the beginning we were impressed with Igor's demeanor, he was always calm and to the point, he did his best to keep us on track with the facts.Thanks to Igor's thorough preparation he was able to get the SA charges stayed. I cannot tell you how incredible that feeling was.We owe so much to him.We highly recommend Igor to anyone needing Legal help, he will work tirelessly on your behalf.OKOLI MARKOKOLI MARK ★★★★★ Thank you Igor Vilkhov for helping me go through my legal case from the very beginning to the end. Igor's professional advice and approach to difficult legal matter is excellent and recommended, Case has been withdrawn from court!! 1 million thanks for the support throughout this process 🙏.Laura BeniaLaura Benia ★★★★★ Professional, honest and caring.Zafreenp PZafreenp P ★★★★★ Igor and his staff were amazing. They were quick and very assertive. Highly recommend them.Best OgunpoluBest Ogunpolu ★★★★★ He gave me great service very very great service. He caught my case with John gave me great advice. He was always there for me. Always answer my call and returned back. My call when it was messed. I recommend him he’s a very great lawyer knows what he’s doing.Gnrl_AnesthesiaGnrl_Anesthesia ★★★★★ I cannot express enough gratitude for the exceptional legal support I received from Igor, an extraordinary criminal lawyer who helped me overcome the toughest challenge of my life. His unwavering dedication, profound expertise, and genuine compassion gave me a new lease on life, allowing me to rediscover happiness after a harrowing ordeal.Just a few months ago, my world was turned upside down when I found myself entangled in a web of false accusations. Suddenly, I was thrust into a nightmarish scenario, stripped of my peace, and faced with the daunting reality of three criminal charges looming over me. My life, once filled with joy and contentment, had been shattered.In my darkest hour, I sought solace and hope in the form of legal representation, which is when I was introduced to Igor. From our very first meeting, I was immediately struck by his professionalism, empathy, and genuine concern for my well-being. He attentively listened to my side of the story, displaying not only a deep understanding of the complexities of my situation but also an unwavering belief in my