(647) 491-5237
24/7 FREE
Available
Available 24/7 FREE
(647) 491-5237

Sexual Assault Lawyer Toronto

Associations and Memberships

Why Hire a Top Sexual Assault Lawyer in Toronto

Igor Vilkhov – assault and weapons defence lawyerBenson Wilson – criminal defence lawyer

Igor Vilkhov is the founder of Vilkhov Law and a certified criminal defence lawyer based in Toronto. He has defended clients facing sexual assault and related sexual offence charges in the Ontario Court of Justice, the Superior Court of Justice, and the Court of Appeal for Ontario. He appears regularly at Old City Hall, College Park, the Superior Court of Justice at 361 University Avenue, and at courthouses across the GTA, including Brampton, Newmarket, Oshawa, and Barrie. Igor is a member of the Criminal Lawyers' Association of Ontario and the Law Society of Ontario.

Vilkhov Law also includes Benson Wilson and Kian Borna, both criminal defence lawyers who work on sexual offence matters. Every sexual assault file at the firm is staffed and supervised by senior counsel from the first court appearance through trial.

Sexual assault cases are among the most demanding files in criminal defence. They almost always come down to one question: Does the court believe the complainant beyond a reasonable doubt? That question is decided through careful preparation, a careful review of the disclosure, tracking every shift in the complainant's account from the first police statement to the witness stand, and cross-examination skills to expose inconsistencies that create doubt. Over the years, I have seen acquittals and charges withdrawn in cases where the evidence initially seemed impossible to defend. Almost every time, the reason was preparation that started on day one.

Igor Vilkhov, Founder, Vilkhov Law

Defending Clients Across the GTA and Ontario Against Sexual Offence Charges

A sexual assault charge in Ontario is among the most serious criminal allegations you can face. A conviction can result in a prison sentence, a permanent criminal record, registration on the National Sex Offender Registry, a DNA collection order, and consequences that affect your employment, immigration status, family, and ability to travel. The strength of your defence depends on the quality of legal representation you secure from the moment of arrest, not from the day your trial begins.

Vilkhov Law has defended sexual assault and sexual offence cases at every level of court in Ontario. We act for clients in Toronto, Mississauga, Brampton, Vaughan, Markham, Scarborough, North York, Newmarket, and across the GTA. If you have been charged or are under investigation, contact us now. The consultation is free, confidential, and available 24 hours a day.

What a sexual assault conviction can mean for you

  • A prison sentence of up to 10 years on indictment (14 years where the complainant is under 16)
  • A permanent criminal record visible on vulnerable sector checks, standard police checks, and CPIC queries
  • Registration on the National Sex Offender Registry under SOIRA, with annual reporting obligations
  • A mandatory DNA collection order was added to the National DNA Data Bank
  • Loss of permanent residence or removal proceedings for non-citizens under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
  • Denial of entry to the United States and many other countries
  • Loss of professional licences in regulated fields, including law, medicine, teaching, and social work

Successful Sexual Assault Cases

The following cases illustrate the kind of work we do in sexual assault matters. Names have been redacted to protect client confidentiality, consistent with the publication ban that applies in sexual offence proceedings.

R. v. L.E. — Charges Withdrawn (Toronto)

Charges: Two counts of sexual assault, two counts of assault, and one count of mischief under $5,000.
Defence: Detailed cross-examination of the complainant exposed significant inconsistencies in the testimony, raising doubts about accuracy and reliability.
Result: The Crown withdrew all charges.

R. v. S.O. — Acquittal (Toronto)

Charges: Our client, a physiotherapist, was accused of inappropriate touching by an office administrator at the clinic.
Defence: Pre-trial disclosure analysis identified material that the Crown had not initially produced. Cross-examination revealed the complainant had omitted important details from earlier statements.
Result: Acquittal — the Crown failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

R. v. L.M. — Acquittal in Five-Week Jury Trial

Charges: Our client, a refugee residing in Canada, was accused of gang sexual assault.
Defence: Crown witness testimony was systematically impeached during cross-examination. Expert DNA evidence demonstrated that our client was not a contributor to the DNA collected from the complainant.
Result: Jury acquittal. Our client was able to remain in Canada and rebuild his life.

R. v. P.W. — Acquittal (False Accusation)

Charges: Sexual assault arising from a consensual encounter that the complainant subsequently reported as non-consensual.
Defence: Trial cross-examination exposed significant inconsistencies in the complainant's account and identified credibility issues.
Result: Acquittal.

R. v. W.L. — Acquittal After Five-Day Trial (International Student)

Charges: Multiple serious sexual offence charges. A conviction would have meant loss of immigration status and removal from Canada.
Defence: Extensive pre-trial litigation and a structured multi-day trial strategy challenging the credibility and consistency of the evidence.
Result: Acquittal on all charges. The Crown failed to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.

R. v. R.M. — All Charges Withdrawn (Workplace Allegation)

Charges: Our client, a long-tenured union supervisor, was accused by a co-worker of sexual assault and criminal harassment.
Defence: A pre-trial motion raised credibility concerns about the complainant that the Crown could not overcome.
Result: All charges withdrawn before trial.

Crafting Your Defence Begins Now

Experienced Toronto defence lawyers can fight your criminal charges.

Call Now at 647-977-5852 or

reach out online for a free review.

What Is Sexual Assault Under Canadian Law

Sexual assault is defined in section 271 of the Criminal Code of Canada. The Criminal Code does not provide a single closed definition of the act itself. Instead, section 265 defines assault as the intentional application of force without consent, and section 271 sets out the offence and the available penalties where the assault is committed in circumstances of a sexual nature.

The test for whether contact is sexual in nature is objective. A court will consider all the circumstances: the part of the body touched, the nature of the contact, any words or gestures that accompanied the act, and whether the contact would be viewed as sexual by a reasonable observer. The offence does not require penetration, injury, or violence. Any intentional sexual touching without consent, including kissing, fondling, grabbing, or groping, can be charged as sexual assault.

Sexual assault vs. sexual interference

Sexual interference under section 151 of the Criminal Code is a separate offence that applies where the complainant is under 16 years of age, and the accused touches the complainant for a sexual purpose. The two offences overlap significantly. Where they arise from the same act, the Kienapple principle prevents conviction for both.

Historical sexual assault — no limitation period

There is no limitation period for sexual assault or any other sexual offence in Canada. A person can be charged years or even decades after an alleged incident. Historical cases pose unique challenges for the defence: the accused may have limited recollection of the events, evidence and witnesses may no longer be available, and the complainant's account may have evolved through multiple retellings. These cases also present significant opportunities for the defence. The passage of time can affect a complainant's memory and reliability as much as it affects the defence's case.

Levels of Sexual Assault in Canada and Sentencing

Sexual offences in Canada are prosecuted under Part VIII of the Criminal Code. The seriousness of the charge and the penalties available depend on the section under which the Crown proceeds, the age of the complainant, and whether a weapon or bodily harm was involved.

Offence Section Crown Election Minimum Sentence Maximum Sentence
Level 1: Sexual Assault (complainant 16+) s. 271 Hybrid None Summary: 2 years less a day. Indictment: 10 years.
Sexual Assault (complainant under 16) s. 271 Hybrid Summary: 6 months. Indictment: 1 year. Summary: 2 years less a day. Indictment: 14 years.
Level 2: Sexual Assault with a Weapon, Threats, or Causing Bodily Harm s. 272 Indictable 5 years (restricted/prohibited firearm); 7 years (subsequent offence) 14 years; life imprisonment if the complainant is under 16.
Level 3: Aggravated Sexual Assault (wounds, maims, disfigures, or endangers life) s. 273 Indictable 5 years (firearm); 7 years (subsequent); 5 years (complainant under 16) Life imprisonment.
Sexual Interference (complainant under 16) s. 151 Hybrid Summary: 90 days. Indictment: 1 year. Summary: 2 years less a day. Indictment: 14 years.
Sexual Exploitation (complainant 16–18, position of trust) s. 153 Hybrid Summary: 90 days. Indictment: 1 year. Summary: 2 years less a day. Indictment: 14 years.
Invitation to Sexual Touching (complainant under 16) s. 152 Hybrid Summary: 90 days. Indictment: 1 year. Summary: 2 years less a day. Indictment: 14 years.

Note on Crown election: Sexual assault under section 271 is a hybrid offence. The Crown decides whether to proceed by indictment or summarily. The election affects available trial procedures and timelines, and your lawyer should track the Crown's election from the first court appearance.

Consent: The Central Issue in Sexual Assault Cases

In the majority of sexual assault prosecutions, the central legal issue is consent. The Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the complainant did not consent to the sexual activity. The legal definition of consent is set out in section 273.1 of the Criminal Code: the voluntary agreement of the complainant to engage in the sexual activity in question.

When consent does not exist

Section 273.1(2) of the Criminal Code lists circumstances in which consent has not been given, regardless of what either party may believe. No consent is obtained where:

  • Agreement was expressed by the words or conduct of someone other than the complainant
  • The complainant was incapable of consenting due to intoxication, unconsciousness, sleep, or other incapacity
  • The accused induced the complainant to engage in the activity by abusing a position of trust, power, or authority
  • The complainant expressed a lack of agreement by words or conduct
  • The complainant, having consented, later expressed by words or conduct a lack of agreement to continue

Silence, passivity, or the absence of physical resistance does not constitute consent. Consent given in the past does not extend to present or future sexual activity. Consent can be withdrawn at any time, including after sexual activity has begun.

Age of consent in Canada

The age of consent for sexual activity in Canada is 16 years. A person under 16 cannot consent to sexual activity with an adult, except in limited close-in-age exceptions set out in section 150.1 of the Criminal Code. A person under 18 cannot consent to sexual activity with anyone in a position of trust or authority over them, including a teacher, coach, employer, or family member.

Honest but mistaken belief in communicated consent

Where the specific facts support it, an accused may rely on the defence of honest but mistaken belief in communicated consent under section 273.2 of the Criminal Code. The defence applies where the accused genuinely believed the complainant was consenting, even if the complainant was not in fact consenting.

This defence is strictly limited. It is not available where:

  • The belief arose from the accused's self-induced intoxication
  • The belief arose from recklessness or wilful blindness as to whether the complainant was consenting
  • The accused did not take reasonable steps, in the circumstances known to them at the time, to confirm that the complainant was consenting

What to Do If You Are Charged or Under Investigation

Do not speak to the police

Do not give a statement, do not explain your side, do not contact the complainant or potential witnesses. Exercise your right to silence under section 7 of the Charter and your right to counsel under section 10(b). No statement helps your case; only silence does.

Bail and conditions of release

A bail hearing usually happens within 24 hours of arrest. The Crown will seek a no-contact order with the complainant, communication restrictions, and, where the complainant is under 16, or there are multiple complainants, a surety or detention. Experienced bail counsel can preserve your job, home, and family relationships while the case proceeds.

Disclosure and investigation

Once charges are laid, you are entitled to full disclosure: police notes, the complainant's KGB statement, forensic and DNA evidence, and any investigative records. The Crown's duty to disclose is ongoing and covers exculpatory material. Your lawyer reviews everything for inconsistencies, investigative gaps, Charter breaches, and material supporting the defence

Trial election

For indictable sexual assault charges, the accused chooses the mode of trial: judge alone in the Ontario Court of Justice, judge alone in the Superior Court of Justice, or judge and jury in the Superior Court of Justice. The choice is strategic and depends on the evidence, the complainant, and the available defences.

Defences to Sexual Assault Charges in Ontario

Every sexual assault case turns on its specific facts. The following defences are the ones most commonly available in Ontario sexual offence proceedings. Your lawyer will assess which apply to your circumstances and build the strategy from there.

Credibility and reliability of the complainant

Because most sexual assault cases have no physical evidence and no third-party witnesses, the Crown's case rests on the complainant's account. Prior inconsistent statements between the initial complaint, the KGB statement, any preliminary inquiry testimony where available, and trial evidence are the foundation of cross-examination. Credibility (whether the complainant is being honest) and reliability (whether the complainant's memory is accurate) are separate concepts and can be challenged independently.

Honest but mistaken belief in communicated consent

Where the facts support it, this defence is a complete answer to a sexual assault charge. The defence requires evidence that the accused genuinely believed the complainant was consenting, that reasonable steps were taken to confirm consent, and that the accused was not intoxicated, reckless, or wilfully blind. In most cases, the accused must testify to support the defence.

Factual consent

Where the complainant in fact consented to the sexual activity, the defence is factual consent. This is distinct from honest but mistaken belief; the position is not that the accused believed there was consent, but that the activity was, in fact, consensual. The Crown must prove the absence of consent beyond a reasonable doubt.

Mistaken identity

Where the complainant does not know the accused, where the alleged assault occurred in low visibility, or where the identification is based on limited observation, identity becomes a live issue. DNA evidence, alibi evidence, surveillance footage, and expert evidence on the reliability of eyewitness memory can all be relevant.

Alibi

Where the accused was not at the location of the alleged offence, alibi evidence is a complete defence. Alibi must be disclosed to the Crown in advance of trial; late disclosure can reduce the weight a trial judge gives to it.

Charter violations

Where the police breached the accused's rights under the Charter during the investigation, unlawful search, failure to advise of the right to counsel, improper interrogation, or other violations, evidence obtained as a result may be excluded under section 24(2). In sexual assault cases, the exclusion of a statement by the accused or critical forensic evidence can lead to a stay or withdrawal of the charge.

Unreasonable delay (Jordan application)

The Jordan framework sets presumptive ceilings of 18 months in the Ontario Court of Justice and 30 months in the Superior Court of Justice, from charge to the actual or anticipated end of trial. Delay beyond those ceilings can result in a stay of proceedings. In sexual assault cases that frequently take longer than expected to reach trial, Jordan delay is one of the most powerful tools available to the defence. Your lawyer should be tracking Jordan from the first court appearance.

Mandatory Consequences of a Conviction: SOIRA, DNA, and Section 161 Orders

The National Sex Offender Registry (SOIRA)

The Sex Offender Information Registration Act (SOIRA) governs registration on the National Sex Offender Registry. Following the Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. Ndhlovu (2022) and Parliament's response in Bill S-12 (in force October 26, 2023), SOIRA registration is no longer automatic in every sexual offence case. The current framework is:

  • Mandatory registration applies where the offence was a sexual offence against a person under 18, prosecuted by indictment, and the sentence imposed is two years or more, and for repeat sexual offenders previously convicted of a designated offence or previously subject to a SOIRA order.
  • The presumption of registration, with judicial discretion, applies in all other cases. The court must make the order unless the offender establishes that registration would have a grossly disproportionate impact on them, or would have no connection to SOIRA's purpose of helping police prevent and investigate sexual offences.

Where a SOIRA order is made, the registered person must

  • Report in person to a registration centre within 7 days of the order or release
  • Report annually thereafter, and immediately on any change of address, name, or other identifying information
  • Notify police of any travel outside Canada lasting 7 days or more
  • Comply with the registration period for the duration ordered by the court

Failure to comply with SOIRA reporting obligations is a separate criminal offence.

SOIRA registration duration

Circumstances Registration Duration
First designated offence with a maximum penalty of up to 5 years 10 years
First designated offence with maximum penalty of 10 or 14 years (e.g., sexual assault under s. 271) 20 years
First designated offence with maximum penalty of life imprisonment (e.g., aggravated sexual assault under s. 273) Life
Two or more designated offences in separate prosecutions, or prior SOIRA order Life

DNA collection orders (s. 487.051)

A conviction for any designated sexual offence under Part VIII of the Criminal Code results in a mandatory DNA collection order. The DNA sample is added to the National DNA Data Bank and compared against DNA from crime scenes across Canada and from partner jurisdictions through information-sharing agreements.

Section 161 prohibition orders

On conviction for a sexual offence involving a complainant under 16, a court may impose an order under section 161 of the Criminal Code prohibiting the offender from attending public parks, swimming pools, school grounds, daycare centres, playgrounds, and community centres where persons under 16 are present; accepting employment or volunteer positions in a position of trust or authority over persons under 16; and using the internet or other digital network in a specified manner. The order can last for years after the sentence has been served.

Immigration consequences

Sexual assault under section 271 carries a maximum sentence of 10 years on indictment — placing it within the "serious criminality" category under section 36(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. For permanent residents, this can trigger loss of permanent residence and removal proceedings. For temporary residents and citizenship applicants, a conviction will likely result in inadmissibility. The immigration consequences of a sexual assault conviction are among the most severe available in Canadian criminal law and must be analyzed before any plea or resolution discussion.

Travel and employment

Canadian sexual assault convictions are accessible to the United States Customs and Border Protection. Entry into the United States will likely be denied. Many other countries impose similar restrictions. Professional licensing bodies for law, medicine, teaching, nursing, social work, and other regulated occupations impose their own sanctions on members convicted of a sexual offence, including suspension or loss of licence.

False Accusations in Sexual Assault Cases

Successful criminal case result – Vilkhov Law

False accusations of sexual assault happen. They can arise from misunderstanding, regret, intoxication on the night in question, anger after a relationship ends, custody disputes, immigration motivations, or, in rare cases, deliberate fabrication. The damage from a false accusation is immediate, as reputation, employment, family relationships, immigration status, and freedom are all at risk before any trial begins.

At Vilkhov Law, we look for the signs that an allegation may not be reliable:

  • Inconsistencies in the complainant's account across statements to friends, police, and the court
  • Significant delay in reporting that is not adequately explained
  • A clear motive to fabricate a custody dispute, immigration application, civil claim, jealousy, or revenge
  • A history of prior false complaints by the complainant
  • Text messages, emails, social media communications, or photographs that contradict the complainant's account
  • Absence of physical evidence in circumstances where it would be expected

We move quickly on these files: secure and preserve digital communications, identify witnesses who can speak to the complainant's motive or prior conduct, and prepare a cross-examination focused on the inconsistencies that create reasonable doubt. The earlier we get involved, the stronger the defence.

Why You Should Act Quickly After a Sexual Assault Charge

Sexual assault charges are extremely serious and can affect your ability to work, travel, or maintain immigration status. A conviction may result in a prison sentence and mandatory registration as a sex offender — both of which carry lifelong consequences.

Taking immediate legal action is crucial. The earlier you retain a skilled sexual assault lawyer, the more time you’ll have to build a strategic defence, preserve important evidence, and address damaging claims before they escalate. At Vilkhov Law, we act fast to protect your rights, reputation, and future. Our legal team is ready to fight back on your behalf and minimize the long-term impact of the charges you face.

Igor Vilkhov – criminal defence lawyer at courthouse Toronto

Call us now for a defence against sexual assault charges

Work with Vilkhov Law for access to a skilled legal team that knows its way around sexual assault cases. These types of cases involve a complex legal process, and must be handled with care from start to finish for the best result.

Contact us today at 866-707-5845 for a consultation to get access to the support that you need related to your sexual assault case.

Frequently Asked Questions

Sexual assault is defined in section 271 of the Criminal Code of Canada. It is an assault committed in circumstances of a sexual nature that violates the sexual integrity of the complainant. The offence does not require penetration, physical injury, or violence. Any intentional sexual touching without consent, including kissing, fondling, or groping, can be charged as sexual assault. The test for whether contact is sexual is objective: whether a reasonable observer would consider it sexual in nature, given all the circumstances.

Consent is defined in section 273.1 of the Criminal Code as the voluntary agreement of the complainant to engage in the specific sexual activity in question. Silence, passivity, or the absence of physical resistance is not consent. Consent cannot be given by a third party. Consent obtained through the abuse of a position of trust, power, or authority is not valid consent. Consent can be withdrawn at any time, including after sexual activity has begun. A person cannot consent in advance to sexual activity that will occur while they are unconscious.

The age of consent for sexual activity in Canada is 16 years. A person under 16 cannot legally consent to sexual activity with an adult, except in narrow close-in-age exceptions under section 150.1 of the Criminal Code. A person under 18 cannot consent to sexual activity with anyone in a position of trust or authority over them, including a teacher, coach, employer, or family member.

Yes. Intoxication of the complainant can negate the legal capacity to consent, even where the accused was also intoxicated. The accused's own self-induced intoxication is not a defence to sexual assault; it cannot ground the honest but mistaken belief in consent defence, and recklessness arising from intoxication does not reduce criminal responsibility. These cases are highly fact-specific and depend on the degree of intoxication of each party, the nature of the conduct, and the available evidence about the encounter.

If the police arrest you, you have the right to remain silent and the right to retain and instruct counsel without delay. Exercise both rights — and contact a sexual assault defence lawyer immediately. The police may release you on conditions or hold you for a bail hearing within 24 hours. At the bail hearing, the Crown will likely seek a no-contact order with the complainant, restrictions on communications, and potentially a surety requirement. An experienced bail counsel can secure release on conditions that allow you to maintain your employment, housing, and family relationships while the case proceeds.

This defence under section 273.2 of the Criminal Code applies where the accused genuinely believed the complainant was consenting, even if the complainant was not in fact consenting. The defence is strictly limited. It is not available where the belief arose from the accused's self-induced intoxication, recklessness, or wilful blindness. It also requires evidence that the accused took reasonable steps in the circumstances to confirm that the complainant was consenting. The defence typically requires the accused to testify and turns on the specific facts of the encounter.

SOIRA is the Sex Offender Information Registration Act, which governs the National Sex Offender Registry. Following Bill S-12 (October 2023), registration is no longer automatic in every case. It is mandatory in two categories: serious sexual offences against a person under 18, prosecuted by indictment, with a sentence of two years or more; and for repeat sexual offenders. In all other cases, there is a presumption of registration, but the court has discretion not to make the order where it would have a grossly disproportionate impact or no connection to SOIRA's purpose. Where ordered, registration requires in-person reporting within 7 days, followed by annual reporting, plus notice of address changes and international travel. Failure to comply is a criminal offence.

The most common defences are: challenging the credibility and reliability of the complainant's account through cross-examination on prior inconsistent statements; the defence of honest but mistaken belief in communicated consent under section 273.2; factual consent, where the activity was in fact consensual; mistaken identity, supported by alibi, DNA, or surveillance evidence; Charter applications where the police violated the accused's rights; and applications for a stay based on unreasonable delay under R. v. Jordan. The right defence depends entirely on the facts of your case.

Sexual assault under section 271 applies to non-consensual sexual touching of any person. Sexual interference under section 151 applies specifically where the complainant is under 16, and the touching is for a sexual purpose. The two offences overlap significantly. Where both arise from the same act, the Kienapple principle prevents conviction on both.

Yes, in appropriate circumstances. The Crown may withdraw a sexual assault charge where: the evidence does not support a reasonable prospect of conviction; the complainant is unavailable or unwilling to testify; Charter violations compromise the admissibility of critical evidence; pre-trial motions reveal credibility issues that the Crown cannot overcome; or the Jordan delay ceiling has been exceeded. Every file is different. An experienced sexual assault defence lawyer will identify the path most likely to lead to withdrawal or acquittal in your specific case.

Severely. Sexual assault under section 271 carries a maximum sentence of 10 years on indictment, placing it within the "serious criminality" category under section 36(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. A conviction can result in inadmissibility, loss of permanent residence, and a removal order. For citizenship applicants, a sexual assault conviction will disqualify the application. The immigration consequences of a sexual assault charge are among the most serious in Canadian criminal law and must be assessed before any resolution is agreed.

Sexual assault cases in the Ontario Court of Justice typically take 12 to 18 months from charge to verdict. In the Superior Court of Justice, 18 to 30 months or longer is common, particularly where the case involves extensive disclosure, expert evidence, or multiple accused. The Jordan framework sets presumptive ceilings of 18 months in provincial court and 30 months in superior court, beyond which a stay of proceedings for unreasonable delay may be available. Your lawyer should be tracking the Jordan clock from the date of your first court appearance.

Areas our sexual assault lawyer serve

Our team of sexual assault lawyers in Toronto and nearby regions serves clients across the GTA and Southern Ontario. Whether you’re in Mississauga, Brampton, Vaughan, or Barrie, we are here to help. Looking for a sexual assault lawyer near you? Contact us now.

What our clients say about us

Client reviews and rating – Vilkhov Law
5.0
Based on 165 reviews from Google

Latest News & Events

Sexual Assault Penalties Under Section 271 (CC 271) of the Criminal Code

Sexual Assault Penalties Under Section 271 (CC 271) of the Criminal Code

Read More
Can You Be Removed from the Sex Offender Registry in Ontario?

Can You Be Removed from the Sex Offender Registry in Ontario?

Read More
What Is the Minimum Sentence for Sexual Assault in Canada?

What Is the Minimum Sentence for Sexual Assault in Canada?

Read More
Contact Igor Vilkhov – criminal defence lawyer

Contact Us

Address
121 Richmond Street West Suite 1100
Toronto, ON M5H 2K1
Phone
Toll Free
Fax
(416) 864-0192
“Caring, honest, and highly
knowledgeable.”